![]() ![]() ![]() However, there are a number of issues with this simple explanation. “Brown patches of sense data in a rectangular arrangement.”Īt least on the face of it, perceptual experience presents itself to us as mind-independent objects. When asked what you see, you describe the external object itself, not your perception of it. So, the immediate objects of perception are mind-independent objects and their properties.ĭirect realism is often thought of as the common sense theory of perception. You are also perceiving its properties (size, shape, smell, etc.). When you look at, and perceive, a tree, you are directly perceiving a tree that exists ‘out there’ in the world. So, basically, what you see is what you get. And we perceive the external world directly (hence, direct).The external world exists independently of the mind (hence, realism).“The immediate objects of perception are mind-independent objects and their properties.” Each theory also has various arguments for and against. anti-realism) and the way we perceive it (direct vs. The theories disagree over such issues as whether the external world exists (realism vs. This A level philosophy topic looks at 3 theories of perception that explain how we can acquire knowledge from experience, i.e. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |